Help us to help you:

Legal Notice:
Please view our Terms & Conditions of use page for our terms and conditions of use for infomation, documentation and downloads.

The first UK website to be
Banned by the British Government by means of
POLITICAL CENSORSHIP
3 times!!!

Click here to find out more.

 


W
elcome to: The Independent Watchdog for the Department for Works & Pensions!

"IT IS A KNOWN FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT OFFICES OF COMPLAINT DO NOT ACT ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC"
QUOTE BY THE DISHONOURABLE JUDGE GARY HICKINBOTTOM CHIEF SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER

Thanks you for your interest in the Campaign Against DWP Corruption (CADC).

”Don't Miss This Bus for Advice and Support!”

We hope you'll find us a useful resource in helping to recognize, combat and raise awareness of abuse of power involving the UK government's largest department, a department dependent upon a sea of civil and judicial servants, we are repeatedly finding not doing their job properly.

In March 2007 Constitutional Affairs Minister Harriet Harman MP spoke on BBC1's Question Time of “transparency” and “adherence to law”.

It is again with sadness, we find her department failing in the latter, this campaign providing the transparency parliament craves.

On the basis of a detailed body of written evidence demonstrating wrongdoing, we seek; abolition of the Office of Social Security Commissioners (OSSC) and the Parliamentary Ombudsman (PO), as they stand.

We likewise campaign for lay involvement in social security appeals, whether by jury or panels, to combat abuse of power in these private judicial courts which we find breaking the law , contrary to their function, as Parliament requires; to uphold it!

We also want to see change in the complaints procedure, again by way of truly independent adjudication for staff misconduct and disciplinary action for all demonstrated instances of mischief within the DWP and its associated bodies including the Child Support Agency (CSA), re-branded the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC).

We aim likewise to inform, how public servants, salaried by the British taxpayer, can, for their own reasons, bully and defraud the weakest members in society , while those judicial servants in place to oversee them, not only condone such, join in, cover up and whitewash their colleagues illegal activity, the DWP remaining a bastion of the archaic and corrupt practice of closing ranks a mentality which invites the campaign.

DWP CORRUPTION – YOU AND “THE LAW”

PRIVATE AGENCIES

As a DWP watchdog, we have found the DWP's Office for Constitutional Affairs using taxpayer's money to employ private legal firms to knowingly and successfully plead for corrupt decisions, from Social Security Commissioners.

USE OF GAGGING ORDERS

We have likewise found DWP management using taxpayers money, to hire private legal agencies to seek to both gag and threaten private citizens attempting to pursue legitimate redress of grievance within the DWP's internal grievance procedure long before the internal procedure is exhausted!

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998

With regard to the Human Rights Act 1998, adopted by the U.K. we observe breaches of this legislation by the DWP routine practice, the Appeal Tribunal Service and the OSSC invariably tolerating or paying only lip service to such, the DWP having little or no interest in their customer's legal rights a situation most benefit claimants know little about.

The so called “new system of protection” namely the European court, requires “domestic remedies” to have been “exhausted”. Although seemingly well intended, the Act is itself vague, slow and beyond the reach of welfare claimants to pursue, such requiring the employment of an advocate for opinion from the court of appeal and beyond, something not covered we understand, by legal aid, not forgetting from past cases it could take over sixteen years to get there as in the Deumeland case.

That protection the public could do without and having sought such, never finding a remedy anyway:

Klaus Deumeland ended up fined DM800 after sixteen years for bringing vexatious proceedings his complaint seemingly being that the proceedings were extraordinary protracted. Make up your own mind whether sixteen years is a reasonable period to obtain (or in his case not obtain) the said protection but otherwise keep the profession in work.

Page 1 - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4

Terms & Conditions of Use:

All documentation must not be download, copied, printed or used in any other way unless the express permission of the owners Mr Martin Hossack corruption@dwpcorruption.co.uk and Mr Paul Ronald ptds05@hotmail.co.uk has been granted.

Disclaimer Notice:

I, Mr P Ronald gave permission in writing through B Condell, to Mr Andrew Yianniddes, owner of the website UK-human-rights.org. Permission was given to act on my behalf in my legal issues. That permission was shortly after revoked due to the extremely dubious actions of Mr Yianniddes. Mr Andrew Yianniddes has no right to act, or represent me, in any legal way or otherwise. This notice has been posted in regard to the very dubious way Mr Yianniddes has recently obtained a copy of my issue from www.dwpcorruption.co.uk

Public Notice:

Dwpcorroption.co.uk has been set up under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (Freedom of Speech) and under the law of a democratic society. Where any lawfully / unlawfully attempt to remove it, only further shows the UK population are merely slaves without shackles!

Click Here to add www.dwpcorruption.co.uk to Favorites list